AbstractA palynological study of genus Dioscorea L. in Korea was conducted to evaluate the taxonomic implications. As a result of confirming the palynological characteristics of seven taxa of Dioscorea L., including six that are distributed in Korea and D. tokoro found in Japan, sections or species were classified according to the characteristics, such as the number of apertures, the polar end shape, and exine sculpturing. Specifically, the exine sculptures of D. coreana and D. tokoro, erroneously known to be distributed in Korea, are distinguished. The change in the number of apertures is closely associated with microsporogenesis, and it can be presumed that disulcate pollen might have been derived from monosulcate pollen in Dioscorea.
INTRODUCTIONThe genus Dioscorea is the largest genus in the family Dioscoreaceae, and approximately 600 taxa can be found in tropical regions, East Asia, along Mediterranean coastal areas, and in South and North America (Coursey, 1969; Li et al., 1978; Ohwi, 1984; Im, 2000; Mabberley, 2005; Lee, 2006). Although most taxa are unisexual, a rare few are bisexual. There are six stamens, but three have degenerated in certain taxa, while in others, three loculi in the ovary develop into wings and two flat seeds with wings from the bracteole developed in one loculus. Based on these characteristics, genus Dioscorea can be distinguished from neighboring genera, such as Rajania and Tamus (Ding and Gilbert, 2000).
The genus Dioscorea in Korea is known to be distributed into eight species (D. polystachya Turcz., D. japonica Thunb., D. nipponica Makino, D. quinquelobata Thunb., D. tenuipes Franch. & Sav., D. tokoro Makino, D. septemloba Thunb., D. bulbifera L.) (Lee, 2003; Lee, 2006; Oh and Lee, 2007). However the distributions of D. septemloba and D. bulbifera are unclear in Korea, though the identity of D. coreana has recently been confirmed (Chung and Chung, 2015; Jeong et al., 2020).
It is difficult to classify the species due to the similar external shapes and great variation, but the pollen morphology of Dioscorea is recognized as an important taxonomic characteristic to distinguish the section and species of Dioscorea (Su, 1987; Schols et al., 2001, 2003, 2005). The pollen is medium-grained, with one or two apertures and perforate, striate, or microreticulate exine sculptures (Huang, 1972; Viruel et al., 2010; Daniel, 2011). Su (1987) classified 33 taxa and five sections of Dioscorea, including D. nipponica and D. tenuipes, based on characteristics such as the shape and size of the pollen and the number of apertures. Schols et al. (2001) conducted a palynological study of 35 taxa of Dioscorea, classifying sections and species of each taxon according to their morphological characteristics, including the pollen size, aperture, and exine sculpturing, while also explaining the relationship between each section based on external morphological characteristics. Later, Schols et al. (2003, 2005) added another 26 taxa to the original study, presenting the taxonomy and the genetic relationships of Dioscorea also based on pollen characteristics.
There are no data pertaining to palynological studies of Korean Dioscorea, including domestic D. polystachya and D. quinquelobata, apart from work by Chang (1986). Additionally, Jeong et al. (2020) re-identified D. coreana Prain & Burkill from its previously mistaken identity of D. tokoro (Lee, 2003; Chung and Chung, 2015). In relation to this, the present study evaluates specifically the taxonomic implications as part of a comparison with the pollen of D. coreana and D. tokoro, erroneously considered to be distributed in Korea and to be distributed in China and Japan (Ding and Gilbert, 2000; Yamashita and Tamura, 2016). A key of palynological characteristics is also presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe materials used in this study were taken from herbarium specimens from the ANH (Andong National University Herbarium), KH (Korea National Arboretum Herbarium), and OSA (Osaka Municipal Museum of Natural History). Specimen information regarding the samples is listed in Table 1. The pollen was extracted from fully bloomed flowers and treated as follows in a slightly modified version of acetolysis (Erdtman, 1971; Radford et al., 1974). The extracted pollen was placed inside a 15 mL conical tube and the acetolysis mixture (acetic anhydride : sulfuric acid = 9 : 1) was added, after which the mixture was placed in a water bath at 80°C for approximately 10 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 1,600–1,800 rpm and the supernatant was removed. Finally, the sample was rinsed twice with glacial acetic acid and once with distilled water and 30%, 50%, and 70% ethanol before being stored in 70% ethanol. To measure the shape and size of the pollen, a permanent preparation was created by taking a small piece of the sample, placing it on a glass slide, and then sealing it with glycerin jelly (Kaiser’s method) (Erdtman, 1971) before the sample dried. The sample was observed using an optical microscope (Olympus AX-70, Tokyo, Japan) and measured using a cursor generator (ver. 2.0, Tokyo Electronic Industry Co., Tokyo, Japan). Exine sculptures that had clearly visible apertures were subjected to observations and measurements. In order to examine the micro-characteristics of the pollen, a small amount of each stored sample was placed on a sample stand and left to dry fully at room temperature. The sample then underwent a gold coating process (thickness: 200–250 Å) using an ion sputtering device and the shape and surface pattern of the pollen were observed and recorded using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Tescan; MIRA3 XMH, Brno, Czech Republic; 15 Kv; working distance; 15 mm).
RESULTSThe pollens of the genus Dioscorea were single grains, small to medium in size at 12.9–30.2 × 9.7–20.4 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter). The pollen shape was prolate at P/E (polar length/equatorial diameter ratio) values of 1.3–1.6. Moreover, the apertures were monosulcate or disulculate and exine sculptures were perforate, striate, reticulate, and regulate (Fig. 1, Table 2).
1. D. polystachya (마): The pollen size was 16.2–19.1 × 11.5–13.5 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.40. The polar end shape was truncate, the apertures were disulcate, and exine sculpturing was reticulate. The sexine thickness was 1.0–1.2 μm (Fig. 1A, Table 2).
2. D. japonica (참마): The pollen size was 12.9–15.6 × 9.7–12.1 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.31. The polar end shape was truncate, the apertures were disulcate, and exine sculpturing was reticulate. The sexine thickness was 1.0–1.2 μm (Fig. 1B, Table 2).
3. D. nipponica (부채마): The pollen size was 20.5–28.1 × 15.5–18.1 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.45. The polar end shape was obtuse, , the apertures were monosulcate, and exine sculpturing was rugulate. The sexine thickness was 1.1–1.6 μm (Fig. 1C, Table 2).
4. D. quinquelobata (단풍마): The pollen size was 22.0–26.4 × 14.3–17.3 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.52. The polar end shape was obtuse, the apertures were monosulcate, and exine sculpturing was striate, with micro-granules present. The sexine thickness was 1.1–1.7 μm (Fig. 1D, Table 2).
5. D. tenuipes (각시마) :The pollen size was 23.1–30.2 × 15.3–19.2 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.6. The polar end shape was obtuse, the apertures were monosulcate, and exine sculpturing was reticulate. The sexine thickness was 1.1–1.74 μm (Fig. 1E, Table 2).
6. D. coreana (푸른마): The pollen size was 23.4–29.7 × 15.1–20.4 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.48. The polar end shape was obtuse, the apertures were monosulcate, and exine sculpturing was perforate. The sexine thickness was 1.1–1.6 μm (Fig. 1F, Table 2).
7. D. tokoro (도꼬로마): The pollen size was 19.4–22.1 × 12.7–15.3 μm (polar length × equatorial diameter) and the pollen shape was prolate at P/E 1.49. The polar end shape was obtuse, the apertures were monosulcate, and exine sculpturing was striate, with micro-granules absent. The sexine thickness was 1.1–1.6 μm (Fig. 1G, Table 2).
DISCUSSIONThe external morphology of the genus Dioscorea can be difficult to use to identify the taxa due to the similarity and severe variation in certain diagnostic characteristics, such as the leaves, flowers, and fruits (Kang et al., 1992; Oh et al., 1995). However, as a result of confirming the palynological characteristics of seven taxa of Dioscorea, including six that are distributed in Korea and D. tokoro, found in Japan, sections or species were classified according to certain characteristics, in this case the number of apertures, the polar end shape, the exine sculptures.
The number of apertures and the polar end shapes are diagnostic characteristics of the section in the Korean genus Dioscorea. Plants in sect. Stenophora (D. nipponica, D. quinquelobata, D. tenuipes, D. coreana, D. tokoro) have one aperture (monosulcate) and a truncated polar end shape, while those in sect. Enantiphyllum (D. polystachya, D. japonica) have two apertures (disulculate) and an obtuse polar end shape. The results of the number of apertures and the polar end shapes were consistent with a report by Schols et al. (2003). They displayed the polar end shape in sections Cryptantha, Enantiphyllum, and Brachystigma, showing it to be truncated and finding the section Stenophora to be obtuse.
Various exine sculptures including perforate, striate, reticulate, and rugulate types were observed in this study, and these were considered as good characteristics that enabled distinctions between species. While D. nipponica and D. quinquelobata have very similar external characteristics, the exine sculptures were observed to be rugulate in D. nipponica and striate in D. quinquelobata. D. coreana has been misidentified as D. tokoro due to their very similar external characteristics (Lee, 2003; Chung and Chung, 2015). Nonetheless, several differences between the two species were revealed by Jeong et al. (2020). Dioscorea coreana was distinguished from D. tokoro by the absence of a pedicel in the male flower, the green color of the tepal, and the shapes of the fruit and seed. In addition, the exine sculptures were observed to be perforate in D. coreana and striate in D. tokoro, and the size of the pollen of D. coreana was also confirmed to be larger than that of D. tokoro.
A change in the number of apertures is closely associated with microsporogenesis (Rudall et al., 1997), and when this occurs through the simultaneous formation of vesicles, it is a relatively easy to see variation (Caddick et al., 1998; Ressayre, 2001). As the number of apertures in the pollen increase, its surface area and frequency of contact with the pistil also increase (Zavada, 1983; Chanda et al., 1988). Furthermore, based on changes in distribution due to morphological characteristics observed in fossil samples of sect. Stenophora (Burkill and Perrier, 1950), it can be presumed that disulcate pollen might have been derived from monosulcate pollen in Dioscorea.
Table 1.Table 2.
LITERATURE CITEDBurkill, IH and Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 1950. Dioscoreaceae R. Br. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Humbert, H (ed.), Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 1-78.
Caddick, LR. Furness, CA. Stobart, KL and Rudall, PJ. 1998. Microsporogenesis and pollen morphology in Dioscoreales and allied taxa. Grana 37: 321-336.
Chanda, S. Nilsson, S and Blackmore, S. 1988. Phylogenetic trends in the Alismatales with reference to pollen grains. Grana 27: 257-272.
Chang, NK. 1986. Illustrated Flora and Fauna of Korea. 29: Pollens. Ministry of Education, Seoul. 899 pp.
Chung, DH and Chung, GY. 2015. A taxonomic study of the genus Dioscorea L. (Dioscoreaceae) in Korea based on morphological characters. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 45: 380-390.
Coursey, DG. 1969. The future of the yam in world agriculture: an appraisal of some problems. Tropical Root and Tuber Crops Newsletter 2: 4-8.
Daniel, IO. 2011. Exploring storage protocols for yam (Dioscorea spp.) pollen genebanking. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 8306-8311.
Ding, Z and Gilbert, MG. 2000. Dioscoreaceae R. br. In Flora of China. 24: Flagellariaceae through Marantaceae. Wu, Z. Raven, PH (eds.), Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis, MO. 276-296.
Erdtman, G. 1971. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy (Angiosperms). Hafner Publish. Co., New York. 553 pp.
Huang, TC. 1972. Pollen Flora of Taiwan. National Taiwan University, Botany Department Press, Taipei. 297 pp.
Im, RJ. 2000. Flora Koreana. 9: The Science and Technology Publishing House, Pyongyang. 217-221.
Jeong, D-H. Kim, J-Y. Jo, H-J. Park, H-W. Lee, K-H. Ji, S-J and Chung, G-Y. 2020. Taxonomic identity of Dioscorea coreana (Prain & Burkill) R. Knuth. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 50: 232-238.
Kang, FH. Lee, CS and Oh, YC. 1992. A systematic study of sect. Enantiophyllum and Stenophora taxa (Dioscorea, Dioscoreaceae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 22: 255-278.
Lee, TB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. 2: Hayangmunsa, Seoul. 727-731.
Lee, YN. 2006. New Flora of Korea. 2: Kyohak Publising Co, Seoul. 473-475.
Li, HL. Liu, TS. Huang, TC. Koyama, T and De, CE. 1978. Flora of Taiwan. 5: Epoch Publishing Co., Ltd, Taipei. 99-109.
Mabberley, DJ. 2005. The Plant Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Vascular Plants. Cambridge University Press, New York. 858 pp.
Oh, YC and Lee, CS. 2007. Dioscoreaceae. The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Flora of Korean Editorial Committee (ed.), Academy Publishing Co, Seoul. 1336-1338.
Oh, YC. Lee, CS and Lee, HJ. 1995. A systematic study on Dioscorea sects. Enantiophyllum and Stenophora in Korea: microstructure and chemistry. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 25: 25-49.
Ohwi, J. 1984. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. 313-315.
Radford, AE. Dickinson, WC. Massey, JR and Bell, CR. 1974. Vascular Plant Systematics. Harper and Row, New York. 871 pp.
Ressayre, A. 2001. Equatorial aperture pattern in monocots: same definition rules as in eudicots? The example of two species of Pontederiaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1219-1224.
Rudall, PJ. Furness, CA. Chase, MW and Fay, MF. 1997. Microsporogenesis and pollen sulcus type in Asparagales (Lilianae). Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 408-430.
Schols, P. Furness, CA. Wilkin, P. Huysmans, S and Smets, E. 2001. Morphology of pollen and orbicules in some Dioscorea species and its systematic implications. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 295-311.
Schols, P. Furness, CA. Wilkin, P. Smets, E. Cielen, V and Huysmans, S. 2003. Pollen morphology of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) and its relation to systematics. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 375-390.
Schols, P. Wilkin, P. Furness, CA. Huysmans, S and Smets, E. 2005. Pollen evolution in yams (Dioscorea: Dioscoreaceae). Systematic Botany 30: 750-758.
Su, P. 1987. Pollen morphology of Dioscorea in China. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 25: 357-365.
Viruel, J. Segarra-Moragues, JG. Pérez-Collazos, E. Villar, L and Catalá, P. (2010): Systematic revision of the Epipetrum group of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) endemic to Chile. Systematic Botany 35: 40-63.
Yamashita, J and Tamura, MN. 2016.
Dioscorea L. Flora of Japan. Vol. IVb. Angiospermae, Monocotyldoneae (b). Iwatsuki, K. Boufford, DE. Ohba, H (eds.), Kodansha, Tokyo. 176-177.
|
|