| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean J. Pl. Taxon > Volume 55(1); 2025 > Article
LIANG, SHANG, LIAO, ZHOU, ZHANG, and DUAN: The complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium porphyrochilum (Orchidaceae)

Abstract

Dendrobium porphyrochilum Lindl. is a valued traditional herb in China for over 2000 years. However, due to overexploitation and habitat destruction, this species now faces the threat of extinction. This study presents the first sequencing and assembly of the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of D. porphyrochilum and investigates its phylogenetic relationships. The result showed that the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum is 154,604 bp in length, comprising a large single copy (LSC) region of 84,816 bp, a small single copy (SSC) region of 17,660 bp, and two inverted repeats (IR) regions of 52,128 bp each. The overall GC content of the plastome was determined to be 37.3%, with GC contents of 35.0% for the LSC, 30.4% for the SSC, and 43.5% for IRa and IRb. In addition, 118 genes were annotated, including 72 protein-coding genes, 8 ribosomal RNA genes, and 38 transfer RNA genes. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis confirmed that D. porphyrochilum belongs to the genus Dendrobium based on the cp genome and coding sequences. These findings provide reliable genetic information for future investigations into the taxonomy and evolutionary relationships of D. porphyrochilum and related species.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Dendrobium Sw., a member of the Orchidaceae family, includes approximately 1,500 species predominantly found in tropical and subtropical Asia, as well as eastern Australia (Wang et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2023). Many Dendrobium species are noted for their extensive pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant, and anti-tumor effects (Zhao et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2023). However, these wild resources have been severely devastated due to prolonged predatory mining. The protection of germplasm resources and the advancement of fundamental research on this genus are pressing concerns. D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum are classified within Sect. Stachyobium of Dendrobium. This section is characterized by succulent growth forms with swollen stems and small flowers featuring light green petals and red veins (Lang et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2021). Research on D. porphyrochilum has mainly concentrated on its cultivation, morphological features, and process (Chen et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018). However, studies on its genetic characteristics and structure are limited, limiting our understanding of its genetic background, germplasm resources, and phylogenetic evolution. Addressing these gaps in genetic information is crucial for advancing the application and development of D. porphyrochilum.
The chloroplast (cp) genome is a key tool for phylogenetic analyses, which have been employed to elucidate genetic and evolutionary relationships (Feng et al., 2023). Some studies have indicated that the cp genome may occasionally yield misleading phylogenetic relationships due to variations in length, the presence of gaps/indels, and the accuracy of sequence evolution models (Goremykin et al., 2005). Nonetheless, shared coding sequences (CDSs) are relatively stable and can be used with cp genomes to construct more accurate plant phylogenetic relationships (Jiang et al., 2022). There are no reports regarding the use of CDSs to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of D. porphyrochilum.
In this study, we present the first de novo sequencing and assembly of the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum. The phylogenetic relationships of D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum were elucidated using the cp genome and CDSs. These findings offer a valuable scientific reference for future phylogenetic investigations and conservation efforts of D. porphyrochilum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fresh leaves of D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum were obtained from the Institute of Caulis Dendrobii in Longling County, Yunnan, China. The voucher specimens (Y23SH504) and (Y23SH492) were authenticated by Prof. Baozhong Duan and are preserved at the herbarium of Dali University. Approximately 1.0 g of fresh leaves were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored for subsequent DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted using the Plant Genomic DNA kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The extracted DNA’s quality, purity, and quantity were evaluated using a high-sensitivity Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA).
Library construction was performed using 100 ng/μL of qualified DNA, followed by sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Paired-end reads were filtered to remove adapter sequences, and lower-quality reads (Phred quality score of <30) using the NGS QC ToolKit_v2.3.3 software. The cp genome was assembled with GetOrganelle v.1.6.4, exploiting Bowtie2 v.2.4.4, SPAdes v.3.13.0, and Blast v.2.5.0 software as dependencies (Jin et al., 2020). The circular cp genome was then annotated using CPGAVAS2 (http://47.96.249.172:16019/analyzer/annotate) (Shi et al., 2019) and GeSeq (https://chlorobox.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/geseq.html) (Tillich et al., 2017). The annotated cp genome sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database with accession numbers PP479730 and PP786689. The OGDRAW tool (https://chlorobox.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/OGDraw.html) (Lohse et al., 2007) was employed to generate a circular gene map of the D. porphyrochilum.
GC content, genome size, tRNA, and repeat content were analyzed using Geneious 9.0.2 software (Darling et al., 2010). Codon usage analysis, including relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), effective number of codons (ENc), GC content of synonymous third codon positions (GC3s), codon adaptation index (CAI), and frequency of optimal codons (Fop), was conducted using CodonW 1.4.2 (Bylaiah et al., 2021). REPuter web service (https://bibiserv.cebitec.unibielefeld.de/reputer/) was used to visualize four types of dispersed repeats (F, forward; R, reverse; P, palindromic; C, complementary) with a minimum repeat size of 30 bp, edit distances of 3 bp, and a similarity threshold of 90% between repeat pairs (Kurtz et al., 2001). Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified using MISA (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/) with thresholds of ‘10’ in mono-, ‘5’ in di-, ‘4’ in tri-, and ‘3’ in tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs (Beier et al., 2017). Boundary information for the cp genomes of D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum was analyzed using the IRSCOPE online tool (https://irscope.shinyapps.io/irapp/) (Amiryousefi et al., 2018). Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed using the cp genome and CDSs from 23 species (Table 1). Two species, Cymbidium elegans Lindl. (GenBank NC067753) and C. floribundum Lindl. (GenBank NC063952), were chosen as outgroup taxa. A total of 23 cp genomes were aligned using MAFFT with default settings and subsequently trimmed using (TrimAl v.1.4, RRID: SCR_017334) (http://trimal.cgenomics.org/) with the automated option (Katoh and Standley, 2013). The best-fit nucleotide substitution model was selected using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017), based on the Bayesian Information Criterion, as implemented in IQ-tree v.1.6.12 (RRID: SCR_017254) (http://www.iqtree.org/) (Nguyen et al., 2015). A bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates was performed in IQtree, using the following parameters: iqtree -s input -m TVM+F+R3 -bb 1000 -alrt 1000 -nt AUTO -o NC063952, NC067753.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After filtering the raw data of D. porphyrochilum to eliminate adaptors and low-quality reads, the cp genomes were assembled and spliced. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum is a circular DNA molecule that exhibits a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of two inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) separated by large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions, respectively. The total length of the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum is 154,604 bp, comprising 84,816 bp for the LSC, 17,660 bp for the SSC, and 52,128 bp for the IR regions (Table 2). The overall GC content of D. porphyrochilum cp genomes is 37.3%, with the IR regions showing a higher GC content (43.5%) compared to the LSC (35.0%) and SSC (30.4%) regions. This discrepancy is likely due to four ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes with high GC content in the IR regions (Bock, 2007).
The cp genome of D. porphyrochilum contains 118 genes, comprising 72 protein-coding genes, 38 transfer RNA (tRNA), and eight rRNA genes. These genes can be categorized into four groups: photosynthesis-related genes, replication-related genes, protein genes, and other genes (Table 3). Of 118 genes, 17 genes are located in the IR region, including eight tRNA genes (trnL-UAA, trnG-UCC, trnV-UAC, trnI-GAU, trnA-UGC, trnA-UGC, trnI-GAU, trnK-UUU), four rRNA genes (rrn16S, rrn23S, rrn4.5S, rrn5S), and six protein-coding genes (rpl22, rpl23, rps19, rps7, rps12, and ndhB). Notably, 19 genes in D. porphyrochilum contain introns, with two genes (clpP, ycf3) having two introns each, while the remaining genes contain a single intron (Table 3).
The amino acid frequency, number of codons, codon usage bias, and RSCU of D. porphyrochilum’s cp genome were analyzed. The results showed that the cp genome encoded 21 amino acids contained 64 codons. Leucine and isoleucine were the most frequent amino acids, while tryptophan was the rarest (Fig. 2). Similar findings have been observed in other Dendrobium species (Shang et al., 2023). An RSCU value below 1.00 indicates lower-than-expected codon usage frequency, while a value above 1.00 indicates higher-than-expected usage (Sharp and Li, 1987). In this study, 28 codons had RSCU values greater than 1, 33 had values below 1, and 3 codons (AUG, UGA, and UGG) had an RSCU value of 1. Additionally, GC3s was 25.8%, reflecting a preference for A/U-ending codons in D. porphyrochilum. The ENc value was 48.62, and the CAI and Fop were less than 0.5, suggesting a slight codon usage bias in D. porphyrochilum.
In addition, 53 dispersed repeat sequences were identified in the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum, consisting of 2 complementary repeats (C), 12 reverse repeats (R), 36 forward repeats (F), and 49 palindromic repeats (P). These repeat sequences ranged from 30 to 50 bp, with the most common lengths being 20 to 39 bp, while repeats longer than 50 bp were the least common. F and P repeat sequences were more prevalent than the R and C repeats (Table 4).
SSRs are tandem repeats of 1 to 6 nucleotide motifs, widely used as valuable tools for species identification and genetic diversity research due to their high polymorphism, site specificity, and presence of multiple alleles (Ahmad et al., 2018). A total of 43 SSRs were identified within the cp genome of D. porphyrochilum, which can be categorized into different types of repeat sequences based on the number of nucleotides, including mono-nucleotide (A/T), di-nucleotide (AG/CT, and AT/AT), tri-nucleotide (AAT/ATT), tetra-nucleotide (AAAG/CTTT, AATT/AATT, ACAG/CTGT, and AGAT/ATCT), and penta-nucleotide (AAATTC/AATTTG) repeats. The most common repeat units were A and T bases, indicating a strong A/T preference in the cp genome, consistent with previous studies on angiosperm cp genomes (Liao et al., 2024).
The cp genome of D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum displayed four boundaries: LSC-IRb, IRb-SSC, SSC-IRa, and IRa-LSC. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the rps19 and psbA genes were entirely located in the IR and LSC regions, respectively. The rpl22 gene was found at the junction of LSC-IRb, originating from the LSC and integrating into the IRb region in both species, with a size of 37 bp. In addition, the ndhF genes were situated at the junction of IRb-SSC in D. strongylanthum. It originated from the IRb region and integrated into the SSC, with a size of 2,201 bp. The ycf1 gene was found at the junctions of IRb-SSC and SSC-IRa in D. strongylanthum. Notably, the ndhF and ycf1 genes were absent in D. porphyrochilum, suggesting that these genes may serve as distinguishing markers between D. porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum.
The cp genome is a valuable source of phylogenetic information, commonly used for reconstructing phylogenies and analyzing plant populations (Kim et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2017). ML trees were generated using cp genomes and CDSs from 21 Dendrobium species. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the two trees exhibit highly consistent topologies, and the phylogenetic relationships among the species remain robust, regardless of the inclusion of non-coding regions. Notably, D. porphyrochilum formed a distinct evolutionary branch, while the two samples of D. strongylanthum did not cluster into a monophyletic group but were instead placed in separate branches. Previous studies have confirmed intraspecific variability in D. devonianum (Shang et al., 2023) and Isodon rubescens (Zhou et al., 2022), collected from different geographical areas. This phenomenon suggests that geographical origin may influence the genetic diversity of D. strongylanthum. Notably, D. hercogiossum and D. aduncum were initially classified as Sect. Brevifores according to traditional taxonomic studies. However, our research shows that these two species are deeply nested within the Sect. Dendrobium branch based on cp genomes and CDSs. Previous studies have also confirmed that D. hercoglossum and D. aduncum should be placed in Sect. Dendrobium rather than the conventional Sect. Breviflores, based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (Wang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012). Therefore, these findings suggest that merging Sect. Breviflores into Sect. Dendrobium might be a more reasonable classification.
In summary, this study has confirmed the preliminarily phylogenetic placement of D. porphyrochilum, providing valuable insights for future research on the taxonomy and evolutionary relationships of D. porphyrochilum and its related species.

NOTES

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Yunnan academician expert workstation (202205AF150026), the science and technology plan project of Yunnan province (202301BA070001-042). We thank Northeast Forestry University and the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences for technical assistance.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Fig. 1.
Chloroplast genome annotation of Dendrobium porphyrochilum drawn by OGDRAW.
kjpt-55-1-52f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Codon content of 21 amino acids and stop codons in all protein-coding genes of the chloroplast genome of Dendrobium porphyrochilum. RSCU, relative synonymous codon usage.
kjpt-55-1-52f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Inverted repeats of Dendrobium porphyrochilum and D. strongylanthum.
kjpt-55-1-52f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Maximum likelihood tree based on the whole chloroplast genome (A) and coding sequences (B).
kjpt-55-1-52f4.jpg
Table 1.
Species information downloaded by NCBI.
No. Species GenBank accession No.
1 Dendrobium wilsonii NC035330
2 D. huoshanense OR387325
3 D. moniliforme NC035154
4 D. hercoglossum NC035328
5 D. aduncum NC038077
6 D. officinale OR387324
7 D. flexicaule OQ360111
8 D. scoriarum NC038079
9 D. falconeri NC035326
10 D. devonianum LC317045
11 D. exile NC035343
12 D. porphyrochilum PP479730
13 D. strongylanthum PP786689
14 D. strongylanthum NC027691
15 D. cariniferum NC080348
16 D. williamsonii OK173601
17 D. ellipsophyllum NC035340
18 D. jenkinsii NC035337
19 D. lindleyi NC071777
20 D. spatella NC035333
21 D. terminale NC071775
22 Cymbidium elegans NC067753
23 C. floribundum NC063952
Table 2.
The base composition of the chloroplast genome in Dendrobium porphyrochilum.
Region A (%) C (%) G (%) T (%) GC (%) Length (bp)
All sequences 30.8 18.9 18.4 31.9 37.3 154,604
IRa 28.2 21.0 22.5 28.3 43.5 26,064
IRb 28.3 22.5 21.0 28.2 43.5 26,064
LSC 31.8 17.9 17.1 33.2 35.0 84,816
SSC 33.7 15.9 14.5 35.9 30.4 17,660

IR, inverted repeat; LSC, large single copy; SSC, small single copy.

Table 3.
Gene composition in Dendrobium porphyrochilum chloroplast genome.
Category for genes Group of genes Name of genes
Self-replication Ribosomal RNAs rrn16S (×2), rrn23S (×2), rrn4.5S (×2), rrn5S (×2)
Transfer RNAs trnQ-UUG, trnS-GGA (×2), trnR-UCU, trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnY-GUA, trnE-UUC, trnT-GGU, trnS-UGA, trnG-GCC, trnfM-CAU, trnT-UGU, trnF-GAA, trnM-CAU, trnW-CCA, trnP-UGG, trnH-GUG (×2), trnI-CAU (×2), trnL-CAA (×2), trnV-GAC (×2), trnR-ACG (×2), trnN-GUU (×2), trnL-UAG, trnL-UAA*, trnG-UCC*, trnV-UAC*, trnI-GAU*, trnA-UGC*, trnA-UGC*, trnI-GAU*, trnK-UUU*
Small subunit of ribosome rpl14, rpl16*, rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 (×2), rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
Large subunit of ribosome rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1*, rpoC2
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase rps11, rps12 (×2), rps14, rps15, rps16*, rps18, rps19, rps19, rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 (×2), rps8
Genes for photosynthesis Subunits of ATP synthase atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF*, atpH, atpI
Subunits of photosystem II psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ, ycf3**
Subunits of NADH-dehydrogenase ndhB* (×2)
Subunits of cytochrome b/f complex petA, petB*, petD*, petG, petL, petN
Subunits of photosystem I psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Subunit of rubisco rbcL
Other genes Subunit of Acetyl-CoA-carboxylase accD
c-type cytochrome synthesis gene ccsA
Envelop membrane protein cemA
Protease clpP**
Translational initiation factor infA
Maturase matK
Genes of unknown function Conserved open reading frames ycf1*, ycf4

Intron-containing genes are marked by asterisks (*).

Table 4.
Number of types of repeat sequences presented in Dendrobium porphyrochilum cp genomes.
Length P F C R
30–39 18 14 9 8
40–49 2 1 - -
>50 1 - - -

R, P, F, and C indicate the repeat types.

R, reverse repeats; P, palindromic repeats; F, forward repeats; C, complementary repeats.

LITERATURE CITED

Ahmad, A., Wang, J.-D. Pan, Y.-B. Sharif, R. and Gao, S.-J. 2018. Development and use of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) markers for sugarcane breeding and genetic studies. Agronomy (Basel) 8: 260.
crossref
Amiryousefi, A., Hyvönen, J. and Poczai, P. 2018. IRscope: An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics 34: 3030-3031.
crossref pmid pdf
Beier, S., Thiel, T. Münch, T. Scholz, U. and Mascher, M. 2017. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 33: 2583-2585.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Bock, R. 2007. Structure, function, and inheritance of plastid genomes. Cell and Molecular Biology of Plastids. Topics in Current Genetics. 19: Bock, R. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 29-63.
crossref
Bylaiah, S., Shedole, S. Suresh, P. S. K. P. Gowda, L. Patil, S. S. Indrabalan, U. B. and Shivamallu, C. 2021. Relative analysis of codon usage and nucleotide bias between Anthrax toxin genes subsist Inpxo1 plasmid of Bacillus anthracis. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 25: 5758-5774.

Chen, T. J., Zeng, R. Z. Guo, H. R. Deng, C. F. Deng, W. M. and Zhang, Z. S. 2018. Wild Dendrobium resources in Qingyuan. Flowers 15: 52-55.

Darling, A. E., Mau, B. and Perna, N. T. 2010. ProgressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5: e11147.
crossref pmid pmc
Feng, J., Xiong, Y. Su, X. Liu, T. Xiong, Y. Zhao, J. Lei, X. Yan, L. Gou, W. and Ma, X. 2023. Analysis of complete chloroplast genome: Structure, phylogenetic relationships of Galega orientalis and evolutionary inference of Galegeae. Genes 14: 176.
crossref pmid pmc
Goremykin, V. V., Holland, B. Hirsch Ernst, K. I. and Hellwig, F. H. 2005. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1813-1822.
crossref pmid
Jiang, Y., Miao, Y. Qian, J. Zheng, Y. Xia, C. Yang, Q. Liu, C. Huang, L. and Duan, B. 2022. Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences of five endangered species and new insights into phylogenetic relationships of Paris. Gene 833: 146572.
crossref pmid
Jin, J.-J., Yu, W.-B. Yang, J.-B. Song, Y. dePamphilis, C. W. Yi, T.-S. and Li, D.-Z. 2020. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile tool-kit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology 21: 241.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q. Wong, T.K. F. Von Haeseler, A. and Jermiin, L. S. 2017. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587-589.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Katoh, K. and Standley, D. M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772-780.
crossref pmid pmc
Kim, K., Lee, S.-C. Lee, J. Lee, H. O. Joh, H. J. Kim, N.-H. Park, H.-S. and Yang, T.-J. 2015. Comprehensive survey of genetic diversity in chloroplast genomes and 45S nrDNAs within Panax ginseng species. PLoS ONE 10: e0117159.
crossref pmid pmc
Kurtz, S., Choudhuri, J. V. Ohlebusch, E. Schleiermacher, C. Stoye, J. and Giegerich, R. 2001. REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Research 29: 4633-4642.
crossref pmid pmc
Lang, K. Y., Chen, X. Q. and Luo, Y. B. 1999. Flora of China. 17: Orchidaceae. Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 551 pp.

Liao, B., Zheng, J. Liu, R. Liu, Y. Liu, X. and Chen, X. 2024. The first complete chloroplast genome of Polygonatum hirtellum: Genome features and phylogenetic relationships. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 54: 72-79.

Li, D., Li, Z.-J. Mao, P. Yan, X.-F. Chun, Z. and Ma, X.-R. 2012. Phylogenetic analysis and identification of Dendrobium species based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 39: 1539-1550.

Li, G. L., Li, Z. S. Zhou, H. G. Bai, Y. B. Gao, Y. Luo, K. and Yao, Z. J. 2018. Research on the characteristics and stem evaluation of Dendrobium porphyrochilum. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences 3: 130-133.

Liu, H.-M., Zhang, C.-Y. Ye, Q. Zhang, T.-M. and Guo, L. 2021. Botanical classification of Dendrobium christyanum based on DNA barcode technology. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 52: 6656-6662.

Lohse, M., Drechsel, O. and Bock, R. 2007. OrganellarGenome-DRAW (OGDRAW): A tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Current Genetics 52: 267-274.
crossref pmid pdf
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A. von Haeseler, A. and Minh, B. Q. 2015. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268-274.
crossref pmid pmc
Shang, M.-Y., Wang, J.-L. Zhou, Y. Zhang, M.-C. Liu, Y.-L. and Duan, B.-Z. 2023. Analysis of chloroplast genome structure and phylogeny of endangered Dendrobium devonianum. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 54: 6424-6433.

Sharp, P. M. and Li, W.-H. 1987. The codon adaptation index: A measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Research 15: 1281-1295.
crossref pmid pmc
Shi, L., Chen, H. Jiang, M. Wang, L. Wu, X. Huang, L. and Liu, C. 2019. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Research 47: W65-W73.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Tan, L. C., Li, Z. Yang, J. Y. and Li, J. J. 2023. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Dendrobium. Shandong Chemical Industry 52: 74-76.

Tillich, M., Lehwark, P. Pellizzer, T. Ulbricht Jones, E. S. Fischer, A. Bock, R. and Greiner, S. 2017. GeSeq: Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 45: W6-W11.
crossref pmid pmc
Wang, D. H., Fan, B. Sun, J. Liu, J. M. Sun, Y. F. and Dai, X. F. 2019. Research progress on chemical components of plants of Dendrobium Sw.. Food and Nutrition in China 25: 12-18.

Wang, H.-Z, Lu, J. J. Shi, N.-N. and Ying, Q.-C. 2006. Analysis of genetic diversity and affinity relationships among 13 species of Dendrobium Sw. by RAPD. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 37: 588-592.

Xu, C., Dong, W. Li, W. Lu, Y. Xie, X. Jin, X. Shi, J. He, K. and Suo, Z. 2017. Comparative analysis of six Lagerstroemia complete chloroplast genomes. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 15.
crossref pmid pmc
Zhao, J.-R., Wang, Y.-H. Jin, Y. Jiang, C. and Zhan, Z.-L. 2022. Research advances in chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Dendrobium plants. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 47: 2358-2372.
pmid
Zhou, Z., Wang, J. Pu, T. Dong, J. Guan, Q. Qian, J. Shi, L. and Duan, B. 2022. Comparative analysis of medicinal plant Isodon rubescens and its common adulterants based on chloroplast genome sequencing. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1036277.
crossref pmid pmc
Editorial Office
Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy
Department of Biology, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea
TEL: +82-42-280-2434   E-mail: kjpt1968@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists.                 Developed in M2PI